The usual model runs backwards: you pay a large implementation, wait months to see anything, and pay a licence on top. We cannot charge you that because we do not carry that cost: we do not start from zero with you, we start from everything we have already built. If it costs us nothing upfront, there is no reason it should cost you.
01
Zero upfront
No implementation fee, no licence, no fixed-price project. You are not signing a payment: you are signing a monthly fee.
The classic model asks for tens of thousands before you see anything working, and ties you to it succeeding so the spend was justified. Here we carry the risk: if next month it is not worth it, you stop paying.
02
The diagnosis is the first month
Not an extra, not a barrier to entry. You start paying the day we start looking — and that month already buys you the map of your operation.
If you decide not to continue after the diagnosis, you have paid one month and you keep the report, which works just as well for getting quotes elsewhere. That seems fairer than billing consultancy separately, and more honest than giving it away and burying it in the price.
03
One single fee
Diagnosis, system, operation, improvements and support. No separate «maintenance», no modules billed once you already depend on them.
What you will not see: a first-year price that doubles in year two, modules that appear exactly when you can no longer leave, or consultancy hours billed above what was agreed. If scope changes, we talk first — not on the invoice.
04
The system is yours; the fee pays for it to work
Building it is the cheap part. The expensive part is that it still works next Tuesday, and adapts when your operation or the law changes.
The system and the data are yours, documented so another team could carry on. The fee does not buy the software: it pays to run it, watch it and improve it. That is why no lock-in is needed — every month we have to earn it again.